home News Blog AnyStreet Hollywood Dextrosphere™ Attractions New Wide Awakes
     Modcon Central        Blogroll

 
   February 08, 2008   
   Modern Conservative endorses John McCain

By unanimous vote of our principals, we endorse the candidacy of Senator John McCain for President of the United States.

Why? Because in spite of our preternaturally youthful looks...we're grown-ups.


Or, if you prefer...because America is more important than any one of us and our personal feelings.


Mitt Romney delivered an amazing speech at CPAC yesterday. He proved himself a noble, good, decent, patriotic man. He showed us all that he's a man we'll be seeing a lot more of down the road, and that we'll be lucky to have him.

There were a lot of specifics in his speech, but if you boil it down, he withdrew from the race for the same reasons that we have now endorsed McCain....

Mitt Romney is a grown up.

He's a patriotic man, and America is more important to him than his own feelings or personal ambitions.

Also...

He's a realist, and he knew that, based on his performance and the fact that all remaining contests were proportional, there was no way he could win.

He's a loyal Republican, and he knew there was nothing he could do by staying in but harm the GOP's chances in November.

He's a conservative, and he realizes that the best vehicle for conservatism has been, is, and will be for generations to come, the Republican Party. (Yes, the GOP has some problems right now with its wavering adherence to some principles, but that can be easily handled by continued engagement of its rank-and-file. Third parties don't work, won't work, and only serve as spoilers.)


If there were any doubt that the man is a conservative, it should be gone after that speech. He was never a flip-flopper. He evolved to become a conservative. NO ONE speaks with that much passion for and clear understanding of conservative principles without believing them in his core. (A trained actor might be able to pull it off...maybe.)

For those of you who did not see, hear, or read the speech, your should at very least read it now. Better yet, go to C-SPAN or YouTube and watch it. I defy you not to choke up with admiration, patriotic pride, and a sense of duty larger than yourself.

I heard a woman call the Hugh Hewitt show and describe her reaction to Romney's speech. She could be heard to weep slightly as she said that, prior to hearing that speech, she had vowed that she would never vote for John McCain, but after hearing the speech, her sense of duty and patriotism overcame her sense of self-importance.

It was a genuine, honorable, and correct reaction...the reaction we all should have. And if it is not the reaction that we have, perhaps we might want to check with a neurosurgeon to find out whether the area of the brain that controls our sense of self-importance has maybe grown a bit too large in comparison to that which governs our sense of duty.


John McCain was never our first choice, for the following reasons...

1. We worried about his age, and his temperament. We saw these as possible liabilities in November, especially if paired against Obama's youthful optimism.

2. We were displeased with specific positions he has taken on several issues of importance to us as conservatives.

3. We were unhappy with the way in which he sometimes appears to almost take a certain pleasure in opposing the caucus, GOP leadership, and the conservative base.

We NEVER called him a "liberal" or said that there's no difference between him and Clinton or Obama. Such a suggestion is indicative either of hyperbole, ignorance, or an arrogant stubbornness (ironically no different than the arrogant stubbornness some have attributed to Senator McCain himself).

American Conservative Union (ACU) lifetime ratings:

McCain: 82.3%
Clinton: 9%
Obama: 8%

Okay? OKAY?

For goodness sake, he is not a liberal. For those of us who are saying that, please stop, because it's untrue, unhelpful, and it makes the person saying it sound silly.

McCain has taken some really bad positions on a small number of issues. Several of them happen to be big issues, which has been a serious problem for us conservatives.

Personally, campaign finance reform infuriates me, because it's violative of the fundamental right of core political speech. So what am I going to do---stay home and hope that Obama or Clinton gives me better? Obama or Clinton will try to add to their many advantages in speech and money by pursuing the Fairness Doctrine to destroy talk radio. They'll probably also find a way to restrict speech on the net somehow, again, in a way that advantages the left. Is that what we want? With McCain, we won't get those things, and as his allies, we may be able to convince him of the error of his ways on BCRA.

In fact, in McCain's very good speech at CPAC, he said the following:

We have had a few disagreements, and none of us will pretend that we won't continue to have a few. But even in disagreement, especially in disagreement, I will seek the counsel of my fellow conservatives. If I am convinced my judgment is in error, I will correct it. And if I stand by my position, even after benefit of your counsel, I hope you will not lose sight of the far more numerous occasions when we are in complete accord.

Mathematically, McCain is going to be the nominee. There is virtually no way around that. So, we can take him at his word that he will do as he says, or we can fold our arms, sit home like spoiled children, and then hope for the best with the man voted the most liberal Senator or the woman whose enemies suffer crippling audits, trumped-up indictments, and worse.

McCain's speech was excellent, and it was exactly what it needed to be: an olive branch.

Now, in your personal life, how many times have you had a disagreement with a friend or loved one? If you've breathed the air and had a friend or loved one, the answer is probably many. Have you noticed the effect an apology has? Even in the heat of the moment, when someone stops and says "I was wrong" or "I totally see now where you're coming from," what has been the reaction? It usually has the effect of disarming the fight. All of a sudden, instead of fire against fire, cool water flows in, and we find ourselves calmer and looking for points of agreement.

Now, how many times, when someone offers out that kind of olive branch, do we just shove it back in his or her face? Rarely. It's just not how personal interaction works.

As imperfect as John McCain is, he's on our side, and he's going to be our guy. We do not demand 100% perfection from our wives, husbands, children, etc. If we did, we would all sit alone in the dark, for there would be no associations between people.

This situation is no different. In his speech, McCain reached out with that olive branch. We should not shove it back in his face just to make ourselves feel better about our own righteous indignation.....that is the path to loss in November.

And loss in November is not just about us. It's about America.

• It's about the Supreme Court, and all the lower appellate courts.

• It's about the war the Islamofascists are waging against all of civilization, a war that Obama and Clinton are determined to lose.

• It's about the unborn, who have in John McCain a man with a lifetime of taking positions in favor of life...or allowing victory for the Democrats, who again and again plant their flag on Baby-slaughter Hill.

• It's about having a man with a 82% lifetime of taking conservative positions or allowing one of two neo-socialists to win.

• It's about the down-ticket races, where many good conservatives will surely suffer defeat if we have depressed turnout. Picture Obama or Clinton in office with super-majorities in the Congress. They'll change redistricting laws and pack the courts and we'll be in the minority for a generation or two.

• It's about more than just us, for goodness sake. It's about a much bigger picture.


Both "sides" of this question need to take a breath.

For their part, moderate Republicans need to remember that the heart of the party lies with conservative principles, founded in the ideals of classical liberalism and the American founding. They need to realize that the Arnold Schwarzennegers and George Patakis of the party are not at the heart of it, and they should not look down upon the conservative base. We had reason to be upset with McCain; they should accept that.

However, those of us who are at the conservative center of the party should not allow that upset to descend into incivility, petulance, or intransigence. McCain is going to be our nominee, and we should now work with him for the betterment of America and the Republican Party.


Moreover, if we look past those areas of disagreement, we also discover that there is a lot to like about the man. There is even, depending on how you look at it, the possibility that some of what we see as liabilities might work out to be strengths for the general election. Return to the three reasons John McCain was never our first choice.

1. His age and temperament might appear to the general electorate as experience, gravitas, and feistiness as compared to Obama's youth, inexperience, and naiveté.

2. Some of the positions he's taken with which we disagree may actually be pleasing to other parts of the electorate. That may be frustrating to us, but it could be the key to victory. He does will with Hispanics, for example, and that really could be the margin in a tight election.

3. Some of the ways in which he has behaved towards his own party will allow some voters to vote GOP that otherwise wouldn't, because they would see McCain as a maverick, not beholden solely to a cabal of evil, scheming Republican high-priests living in an underground pyramid beneath Virginia.


Frustrating not to have someone with a 99.9% ACU rating as our standard bearer? Sure. But that is not our choice now.

We can have 82.3% of a loaf, or we can have nothing. Actually, less than nothing, because the alternative is a disaster. The alternative is...

• a charming neo-socialist who will bring millions of young voters into the process, making neo-socialism attractive through his charm...a man who will, by virtue of his skin color alone, solidify the disastrous hold the Democrats have on black lives and black voters for another generation or more, or

• a pair of bloodthirsty hillbilly grifter neo-socialists who have a habit of using government power to ruin the lives of anyone who dares oppose them.


McCain has extended an olive branch. It's time to reach out and work with him for the future of America. And that is just what we intend to do.


Chris, As some one differs with you on a couple of issues and the implementation of some others, I find myself in TOTAL and complete agreement with you on this article. McCain is by far better than the alternatives in Obama and the Clintons (Anyone who thinks Bill will not have a large say in Her White House is foolish.) Mitt Romney did a great and honorable thing in suspending his campaign. He did what was best for his country and for his party. We WILL see and hear from him again on the national stage. Just like RWR's 1964 convention speech launched him, this speech will long be remembered by his party and its members. We need to keep in sight that the Supreme Court IS going to be in play in the next 4 years. 1 to 3 seats will be filled in that time. I hate to think of the court we would wind up with from Hillary. I am sure it would include her husband. A life time of Bill Clinton on the Court would be a terrible fate for our nation. Now is the time for the party to unite. The first act of that is for Huckabee to suspend his campaign also. He can not win. He can only harm the party. If he truly loves his country and his party as he claims, any other act is just self serving and ego.

Posted by Bil Cook on 2008-02-08 09:02:31

McCain/Feingold McCain/Kennedy McCain/Lieberman Voted against tax cuts. That doesn't bother you.

Posted by Cindy on 2008-02-08 10:07:38

Chris, I have great respect for you and agree with you most of the time. This is a thoughtful and well written article filled with common sense, yet some points are quite arguable. To infer that opposition to your stance is childish or selfish is unfair. The point not addressed is that the 'CHOICE' of McCain was not and is not REPRESENTATIVE. We in Washington State have yet to caucus or vote SO the implication is much greater than your label of 'personal feelings'. It has everything to do with what America stands for - representative government. I have not said McCain is a liberal - I state he is a democrat. His voting record, words, and the stands he takes support this assertion. So I still believe our choice is between a Liberal and a Democrat and that our party is not truly represented here - Nor are the Republicans in the state of Washington along with many other states. That said, of course I will vote the Republican ticket in the general election. In the future, though, there must be some new means by which American and constitutional values are upheld by ensuring the representation of all states instead of a few.

Posted by Jo Ann Hill on 2008-02-08 10:21:37

The think that you and the other "hold your nose" and vote crowd don't understand is that he is WRONG on the BIGGEST issue - ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. Terrorism is not the biggest issue. Terrorists can kill people, but they can not change our way of life. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION can and is changing our way of life. If McCain is elected, in 8 years, there will no longer be an America as we know it. Instead this will be a Hispanic-speaking, socialist country. You think I'm being alarmist, look at the demographics. John McCain can and will do nothing to stem the tide. You may argue that neither will Hilobama, but the difference is that we won't be able to stop McCain. How will Repubs that just electred McCain knowing his position on illegal immigration be able to claim they're against it. I get that you would vote for anyone with an R after their name, be it Hitler, Huseein, or Pol Pot. But I refuse to ease the destruction of this country, just so we can say "We Won" the election.

Posted by steve on 2008-02-08 10:27:58

Bil:
I too hope Huckabee suspends soon. If he does not, then it might be argued that he is not half the statesman that Romney is.

Cindy:
Of course those things bother us! Please read the argument being made in the article more carefully.

Jo Ann Hill:

In most presidential primary years, the first states vote and the election is decided. The rest of the states just go through the motions of anointing the candidate chosen by Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. This year, Washington State came closer than usual to having a say. I think an argument can be made to change the primary system, but that will have to be for another day. Certainly we should have closed primaries from now on, so that only Republicans get to vote. Then this McCain thing would not be an issue. But it is.

Also, to you, Jo Ann, and everyone:
I am NOT saying that opposition to McCain is childish. I opposed McCain. I am saying that NOW that he is going to be our nominee---mathematically, that is just so---it is childish to say that one will sit home and not vote in November. I stand by that assertion.

Steve:
You make a decent argument, but there is a lot more going on than just immigration. On a host of issues, we will do much better with McCain than with the alternatives. I'd rather have some of something than non of something.

Posted by Christopher Cook on 2008-02-08 10:47:45

Thanks Chris, so well said I will pass this article around. Extremism and fundamentalist mind set will hurt the greater good. We have to unite for our candidate.

Posted by Linda Werstiuk on 2008-02-08 10:54:01

Chris, As much as I respect you, please change the name of your site from "Modern Conservative" to "Modern Republican." Conservatives don't abandon their most important principles to win elections. Instead, they win elections by standing on their most important principles. Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich taught us that. Losing elections by governing like ineffectual Democrats -- Gerald Ford, Bob Dole and the 2006 Republican Congress taught us that. McCain will too. If I have learned anything since 2004, it is that I am a Conservative first and a Republican second. You have decided the opposite, Chris. I love the Hell out of you personally, Chris, but at least recognize what you're doing, well-intentioned though I know you to be. As Ice Cube says, "Check yourself before you wreck yourself!" Joe

Posted by Joe on 2008-02-08 12:16:29

We need to win in November more than we need any further swabbling on who is more conservative. I prefer McCain in charge because I think he's more likely to put the fear of God into our enemies. A temper can be an asset to a general or commander-in-chief, and I have every faith that McCain's temper is one he can manage. I cannot stress to this audience enough that the feeling of security and aptitude for battle will be less felt with Huckabee in charge, and completely absent with Ha dem. It is something I have gotten used to in eight years under George Bush, and I will not have it gone for the sake of a few lofty ideals.

Posted by judgeedee on 2008-02-08 12:51:22

Chris, get article. I understand fully that not everyone has accepted McCain as our next president, but being at CPAC for the last week I have heard many things for and against our next nominee. The most powerful thing said though was by Newt Gingrich this afternoon. Newt said, "I would much rather have a President that I agreed with 80% of the time, rather then a President that I disagreed with 90% of the time." I believe this to be a statement that all conservatives should take a look at from one of our great conservative leaders. McCain might not be the most conservative man on earth, but compared to the other choices he is someone we need to support. The other important point from today was from the Straw Poll here at CPAC. Romney did win the straw poll both pre and post his suspension but McCain did just in support after Romney's speech. Post Romney's suspension the key issues for the next president were the same. This was said that although McCain is our nominee our issues are consistent meaning he needs to work with conservatives to gain our support. His speech made it clear that he would do just that. Our issues are important, and McCain will not throw them to the side, he will respect and learn from them. He said it himself, and I believe he will keep that promise. As conservatives we need to unite to prevent the socialist overthrow of this country. Reagan worked to hard to defeat the USSR, we can not let them take over our country.

Posted by Michael on 2008-02-10 00:23:07


    Please enter your comments in the form below.

Name:  (REQUIRED)
Email:
Home Page:
Comments:  (REQUIRED)
 
Search
Web ModernConservative.com
  

Stay informed—sign up for email updates!

Support our efforts
Defeating the left isn't cheap. Please make a donation today!
Other ways you can help
 
Conservative Gear!
Bumperstickers: What Would Churchill Do? ModernConservative Coffee Mug
T-Shirts, mugs, bumper stickers, and more!
Buy and sell in our classifieds
   
Site News
  Modern Conservative is seeking volunteers






OmahaSteaks.com, Inc.





Archives Search
For what page would you like to see archives?
Select Month & Year:   
Web ModernConservative.com
  
 Terms & Conditions   The Modcon Papers 
 About Us Get Involved 
 Privacy   Contact Us 
 Help Copyright 2008 ModernConservative.com Advertise