by Christopher Cook

The Milwaukee 5 go on trial.

Proving that an "elephant never forgets," Michelle Malkin has put up a post on the Milwaukee 5.

What's that you say? What is the "Milwaukee 5"? Well golly, that's what the MSM would be calling them if they had been Republicans. But they weren't. They were Democrats. Democrats who slashed the tires of Republican get-out-the-vote vehicles the morning of the 2004 election.

Needless to say, most of the MSM paid the story little or no attention at the time. And, for all of the Democrats absurd bluster about Ohio, a state Bush won by more than 130,000 votes, Kerry won Wisconsin by fewer than 14,000 votes. Gee...I wonder if those 30 campaign vehicles---and all the campaign workers rattled and sidelined by the attack---could have reached enough people to get out another 14,000 votes in a city the size of Milwaukee? Hmm. Most polls (ignoring pathetic outliers like John Zogby, to whom no one should pay any attention ever again) had Bush winning Wisconsin by a small margin.

(Actually, there were a number of states that Kerry won by a much closer margin than Bush won the "controversial" Ohio...but this is a digression. We will be handling Democrats' vote fraud and serial deception at another time.)

We are actually talking about Democratic violence and intimidation, and the MSM's failure to cover it. And there were lots of acts of violence and intimidation that they failed adequately to cover, like...

...coordinated violence and intimidation by members of the AFL-CIO, which prompted Bush-Cheney '04 Campaign Chairman Governor Marc Racicot to send a letter to AFL-CIO President John Sweeney requesting that Sweeney put a stop to violence against Republicans by union members,

...gunshots fired into Bush-Cheney campaign headquarters in Knoxville, TN,

...Bush-Cheney headquarters being ransacked and vandalized in Orlando, FL,

...a swastika being burned into a Bush supporter's lawn,

...an attempt to run over Katherine Harris,

...an overall climate of fear created by Democrat partisans during the 2004 election (great work from Stanley Kurtz!),

...campaign ads no Republican group could ever get away with, including one that essentially celebrates beheading and another that makes fun of the handicapped,

...and more,

...and even more...with mugshots! (Thanks, Michelle Malkin!)



Of course, this is by no means only a recent phenomenon. When they are out of power...when they feel their ability to control the populace through control of the media...or when their treasured institutions like SLAVERY are threatened, they tend to react violently, like when Democrat Senator Preston Brooks caned Massachusetts antislavery Republican Senator Charles Sumner nearly to death on the Senate floor.

...or when white Democrat terrorists killed several blacks in Vicksburg,

...or white Democrats' supression of black votes by a systematic campaign of fraud and violence,

...or the killing of numerous blacks in the Danville, Virginia, Riot of 1883; the New Orleans, Louisiana, Riot of 1900; the Atlanta, Georgia, Riot of 1906; the Rosewood, Florida, Riot of 1923; and the Tulsa, Oklahoma, Riot of 1925,

...or the fact that the KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party, founded by Democrats to purge Republicans from the South.

But this is what we should expect, when we know history, from the Democrats, the party of Slavery, Jim Crow, Segregation, the KKK, opposition to the 13th and 14th amendments, the 1960 Civil Rights Act... (read the whole list from Delroy Murdock!). This is, after all, the Party that still today has a former KKK recruiter (a "keagle") as one of its most "distinguished" Senators, against whom they've never even arranged a primary challenge. (These and many other facts will be coming out soon in a great new movie called Emancipation...Revelation...Revolution.)

Of course, someone is going to come along and claim that I am only saying this because I am a Republican. "Republicans are just as violent," he or she will claim. Well, there's a little test you can do to get a sense of whether or not that is true. There's a rather popular little search engine out there called Google.com. (And Google appears to be run by partisan Democrats, considering that they gave 100% of their contributions to Democrats and 0% to Republicans, so conspiratorial claims that they are biased against Democrats won't wash.) Here's the test:

Do a search in Google for the words "violence by democrats" in quotes.

Then, perform a search for "violence by republicans" in quotes.

What you discover is fascinating...and quite revealing. The first search, "violence by Democrats," produces scores of hits of news stories about violent acts with Democrats as the perpetrators and Republicans as the victims. There are also numerous forum discussions and blog posts on the subject. The second search, "violence by Republicans," also produces a lot of hits. However, these hits are referring to violence by the Irish Republican Army. You know---the one in IRELAND? What few hits there are referring to Republicans in America are mostly from people on discussion boards mentioning that no comparable stories of violence by Republicans were to be found during the 2004 election season. And you're not going to find many, at least not credible ones, from then or any other time.

And the reason is because Democrats are far-and-away more violent than Republicans.

Why is discussion of violence by democrats from back in 2004 (and earlier in American history) important today? Well, as David Lynch's character Gordon Cole enjoyably said in an episode of Twin Peaks, "Take another look, sonny---it's gonna happen again."